Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6300 - 466 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$59.57 vs CA$349.86
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-14400 - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.75 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
466
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$349.86
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
371
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |