Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 25% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3900 - 148 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$21.99 vs CA$349.89
- Up to 92% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-14400 - CA$0.19 vs CA$2.36 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.36/FPS
8%
Price, CA$
CA$349.89
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
118
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |