Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - 199 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$250.0 vs CA$307.17
- Up to 27% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - CA$1.26 vs CA$1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$307.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16724 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |