Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield V than FX-8320 - 258 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$194.99 vs CA$239.75
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-8320 - CA$0.76 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$239.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$194.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$194.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |