Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$239.75 vs CA$265.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 51% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 196 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 27% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8320 - CA$1.35 vs CA$1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$239.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |