Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 138 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than FX-6100 - 212 vs 211 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
211
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |