Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-875K is 638 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 19% better in League of Legends than FX-6200 - 62 vs 52 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
62
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
