Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3305 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6200 - 161 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |