Buy on Amazon
CA$84.01
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-6100 - 211 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
210
99.52606635071089%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.01
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
