Buy on Amazon
CA$87.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8150 - 101 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
