Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 1917 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$125.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74733 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
40.97035040431267%
Multi-Core
1043
22.182050191407914%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |