Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 4100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1642 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 4100 - 60 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 3 4100 - CA$114.21 vs CA$125.25
- Up to 10% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 4100 - CA$1.9 vs CA$2.12 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
59
98.33333333333333%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.12/FPS
89.62264150943395%
Price, CA$
CA$125.25
91%
Buy for CA$125.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44125 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
60
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$114.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$114.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1484
95.98965071151359%
Multi-Core
4702
84.00929069144183%
AMD Ryzen 3 4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |