Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - 178 vs 156 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - CA$104.99 vs CA$225.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-8600K - CA$0.67 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$225
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16725 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
156
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |