Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1495 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 22% better in F1 23 than Core i3-4130 - 230 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - CA$84.99 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-8600K - CA$0.45 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
189
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |