Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 275 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700 - 178 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - CA$225.0 vs CA$279.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700 - CA$1.26 vs CA$1.6 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12513 minutes ago
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |