Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 915 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - 180 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |