Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 606 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930 - 182 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$160 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |