Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 915 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930 - 132 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$145.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |