Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 2587 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-875K - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 95 vs 180 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
111
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Naples | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |