Buy on Amazon
CA$98.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 2087 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than FX-6100 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 64 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 95 vs 180 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Naples | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
