Buy on Amazon
CA$99.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EPYC 7551 - 159 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 4-Core Comet Lake Processor 3.70GHz 8GT/s 6MB LGA 1200 CPU Retail
Buy for CA$99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
