Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2865 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-875K - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-875K - CA$49.99 vs CA$112.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-875K - CA$0.45 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |