Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7551 - 191 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |