Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 2758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - $232.12 vs $255.00
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 47% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 246 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.04 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1236 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$255
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1235 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |