Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2114 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 200 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $127.00 vs $232.12
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.64 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 400 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$127
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $127 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 398 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |