Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2130 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 638 vs 519 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $117.06 vs $232.12
- Up to 60% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.18 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
638
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$117.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $117.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |