Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2290 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 34% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 231 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $199.99 vs $232.12
- Up to 35% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.87 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7031 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7030 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |