Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1758 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 140 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $172.00 vs $232.12
- Up to 30% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.23 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7264 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$172
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $172 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7263 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |