Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $144.59 vs $232.12
- Up to 48% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.11 vs $2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $144.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |