Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2045 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 562 vs 523 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $76.78 vs $232.12
- Up to 68% better value when playing World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.14 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
562
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |