Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 6154 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 6154 is 1086 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4160T - 234 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 35 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Gold 6154 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon Gold | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
200 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |