Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 6154 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 6154 is 546 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 405 vs 391 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 15 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Gold 6154 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon Gold 6154
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon Gold | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
