Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 6154 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 6154 is 1037 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 127 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 36 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 120 vs 200 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon Gold 6154
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
18 | Cores | 12 |
36 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
