Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1588 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5620 - 251 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
