Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2662 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5620 - 172 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 64 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
