Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 3310 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5620 - 153 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
