Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2673 v3 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2673 v3 is 742 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |