Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2640 - 736 vs 596 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 20 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
736
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |