Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2640 - 252 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 20 vs 12 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
252
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$242.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |