Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2640 - 542 vs 504 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
542
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |