Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2640 - 734 vs 596 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
734
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |