Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2640 - 237 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |