Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1675 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 54 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |