Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 1674 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 466 vs 440 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
466
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |