Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 490 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 199 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 77 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |