Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 966 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
