Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1498 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $81.79 vs $279.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-10850K - $0.52 vs $1.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 164 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
158
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |