Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $81.79 vs $145.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Control than Core i5-11600KF - $0.41 vs $0.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 205 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
201
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |