Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-8320 - $171.04 vs $175.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8320 - $1.32 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$171.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $171.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |