Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 197 days older than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Pentium G4560 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 90% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $22.69 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77819 minutes ago
Buy for $22.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
707
64.98161764705883%
Multi-Core
1452
37.24987172909184%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |